Friday, December 12, 2008

How to lose friends


and irritate (p.... off) people.
Just put out a contrary opinion. Express some doubts on a point of view.
Ayayay...caramba.
Simply because someone is an adult does not mean, the person is mature.
Sheeesh...
I respect people's convictions no matter how wrong they are. I was wrong once myself.
I know how it is, ever since I knew it all I have been revising my paradigm.

6 comments:

Past Elder said...

What brought this on?

Not that I need an answer. First I have to sort out a metaphysical problem of the highest order. Megan Fox more closely materialises the form of beauty I know to be true, but Kirsten Dunst is a flat out complete and total babe.

I will search the CPH site for books that may help.

L P Cruz said...

PE,

hahaha, hope you found some comic relief in my last paragraph.

First I have to sort out a metaphysical problem of the highest order. Megan Fox, ...Kirsten Dunst


Hahaha (LOL) -- you got good taste.

I said to the missus once, the time I need love is not when I am good, the time I need love is when I am being a total jerk of an ass.

ya with me?
What brought it up?

I occasionally regret how the truth sometimes divide friendships.

Frankly, you do not have to agree with me to be my friend, unfortunately for some, that is a requirement. However, it is not a requirement of mine.

The nice thing I appreciate about you is that though we may have minor differences /finer differences that is, we are still connected. Thanks for that.

Speaking of philosophy/metaphysics, I am thinking of Godel's philosophy of time, I will post one soon.

LPC
PS. Last Tuesday, as I was being driven by the missus to work, I thought about how Dr. Maher might be doing that day.

Past Elder said...

Thanks for pointing me to the last paragraph. That's my solution! Fact is either Megan Fox or Kirsten Dunst can revise my paradigm any time she wants, however, to keep the effort to figure which is preferable proportionate to the likelihood of either happening, I should spend zero effort figuring out which is preferable.

Ain't math great! Teaches you how to think. Which reminds me, did I miss the post announcing the return of "Godel"? Which further reminds me, that post on the philosophy of time -- I hope it beats mine on multitude and magnitude to press! (No worries mate, it will.)

Doorman-Priest said...

"I was wrong once myself."

Ha! Me to, but I won't do it again!

L P Cruz said...

PE,


Fact is either Megan Fox or Kirsten Dunst can revise my paradigm any time she wants

OK same here, so you will forgo geeky deep historical philosophizing for Megan or Kirsten?

Hahahaha.

Godel came back to inspire me to finish the thesis -Tiered Logic for Contextualizing Logics.

PE, Godel's philosophy of time is so offensive to philosophers he was told to bugger off.

In my thinking when you take Godel's philosophy of time (which to him reduces time to an ideal) to its final conclusion - you will have a philosophical tool for confirming the Judaeo-Christian understanding of eternity.

LPC

L P Cruz said...

DP,

Ha! Me to, but I won't do it again!

Whewwww. I am glad I am not alone. I am glad there is someone besides myself who now knows it all.

To paraphrase Muhammad Ali - you can not afford to be humble when you are as great as I am.


LPC