Many so called “confessionals” are offended with Pietism.
Many pastors who claim to being “confessional’ deem them to be the enemy of “the
faith”. The pietists emphasized life more than doctrine, it is behaviour over theology.
They hate it with vigorous hatred. Indeed, it is to your doom once you are
labelled a “pietist”. There are many bad
words amongst “confessionals” you dare not get pinned on you. This probably
takes the cake.
Whereas to the extreme, some of the Pietists value much,
living the faith, that it deteriorates Christianity to a work-based religion,
there are some things I respect and learn from Pietism.
I must remember that Pietism is a reaction to dead
orthodoxy. Hence, if you do not want pietism to rise in your midst, stop
being dead in your faith.
Dead orthodoxy, stinks like a dead church mouse. Pietism is
a rightful rejection of it. Pietism did not rise from a vacuum; it arose out of
human reflection on one’s life in line with Christ’s teaching in comparison to
believing versus the doing. You do not need to look away from you to others,
you just look at your own life, and you will agree, it is stale like bland
bread. Faith produces works. Faith
without works is dead. Even James 2:14-26.
What I observe with dead orthodox people is that in the
main, there is lack of love, when in fact this is what faith is supposed to
produce. In the NT, the Pharisees valued observance of rules over love and
compassion for the people in need. Jesus’ very actions rebuked this proud idea
- we see this encounter in Matt 12: 1-14. For the Lord, doing something compassionate
for a person in need, is more important than following the rules.
Dead orthodoxy, does not have faith that leads to love, it
just has rules. It prides itself with following rules from tradition. Mk 7:7-13.
Dead orthodoxy does not like talking about demonstrable expressions
of faith; when you get emotional with Jesus, that is a no-no. It denies that
faith that produces love for God and fellowman does not have to affect you.
Correct, I said, affect. It is impossible to say we love Christ and we are
indifferent towards him, or to say, we love our brothers and sisters in the
faith and not feel their sorrow nor feel their joy. Affection, people who claim
“orthodoxy” don’t have this.
In dead orthodoxy, affirming sets of assertions, thus
doctrines, is much easier than working on repenting of your behaviour. It is a
great substitute for being accepted by your circle and even transposing it to
think you are being accepted by God.
To me pietism is really a reaction against hypocrisy.
This love that faith produces according to St Paul in Gal 5:6,
he also defines, in 1 Cor 13:1-13. This is the character of this love. He even
says, even if I have understanding of all knowledge and have no love, I am
still nothing. Even if I have faith to believe the impossible to happen, and
yet have no love, I am still nothing.
This love combines mercy and truth together – it is found in
our Lord Jesus who is described by St John where grace and truth are found John
1:17. The Psalmist said the same Ps 85:10. Dead orthodoxy has one but does not
have the other, which is fake after all because love is not found nor evident
in it.
Jesus and his disciples like Paul and John talked about love.
If we miss this important issue, we miss the whole point of the Lord’s
teaching. St John even says God is love. It is the fruit of the HS.
You want rules? Only one rule Gal 5:14. All laws are
fulfilled in with one word – love.
Love to many is not interesting – having a theological brawl
is more exciting. People are bored by this teaching about having love for our
neighbour and even our enemies. It is less attractive because it is hard.
Indulging in believing this or that is a lot easier, you can do it on the couch.
What the Good Samaritan did was hard. It involved his time,
his money and his energy, but it was he who showed love not those who claim orthodoxy
such as the scribe who passed by.
To miss a faith in Christ that has no love is to miss the
whole point of the Christian faith.
Actually, maybe I should have changed my title of this post.
Maybe it should be -- Thank you, Pharisees! I mean it!
2 comments:
Hi Lito. In the US, those who claim to be loyal to Walther/Stephan call themselves orthodox and confessional, and they call their opponents Pietists. However, Walther and Stephen were both cell group Pietists, so they confuse the issue due to their reliance on the Walther mythology that he would show the American Lutherans the true Luther (himself).
Hi Pr Greg,
Yes, in the US, the Waltherians have appropriated the term. They behave like a cult-like group in the USA.
They look to me like his adherents suffer from scrupulous mentality, they are conscious of getting every bit of doctrine right. This could be a sign of bad mental health. There are many false teachers around, that is why God wants us to read his Word, if we are misled by them, we are partly at fault if we do not rely on the authority of Scripture. Besides we are no help to the Kingdom of God if Scripture is not our guide and what I see in those who identify as 'confessional's they argue by authority.
Walther is their Rabbi.
LPC
Post a Comment