tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15967712.post7465545478332102853..comments2024-02-27T00:11:57.219+11:00Comments on Extra Nos: Australian Lutherans decided not to be like Episcopalians (for now)LPChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11352627830833515548noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15967712.post-53872608934594337182016-06-16T20:23:50.831+10:002016-06-16T20:23:50.831+10:00Hehehe, due to "lack of good evidence"?
...Hehehe, due to "lack of good evidence"?<br /><br />So what is this so called "good evidence"? Is this ex-believer now willing to define what this good evidence should be so that when such is presented he will recant and come back to the fold?<br /><br />Why are those who testify of Jesus' resurrection not reliable witnesses? (I have read some parts of this ex-believer's responses).<br /><br />This comes to the area of trust, i.e. will you trust the so called witness or not?<br /><br />Let us put it this way, I am skeptical of this person's skepticism of Christ's resurrection.<br /><br />LPChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11352627830833515548noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15967712.post-90776510707024249422016-06-16T06:51:30.371+10:002016-06-16T06:51:30.371+10:00Are our pastors telling us the truth?
Are Christi...Are our pastors telling us the truth?<br /><br />Are Christian pastors honest with their congregations regarding the evidence for the Resurrection? Is there really a "mountain of evidence" for the Resurrection as our pastors claim or is the belief in the Resurrection based on nothing more than assumptions, second century hearsay, superstitions, and giant leaps of faith?<br />Check out this Lutheran pastor's defense of the Resurrection and a review by one of his former parishioners who lost his faith and is now an nonbeliever primarily due to the lack of good evidence for the Resurrection:<br /><br />http://www.lutherwasnotbornagain.com/2016/06/a-review-of-lcms-pastor-john-bombaros.html<br />Garyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02519721717265344702noreply@blogger.com