tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15967712.post3899001381815605661..comments2024-02-27T00:11:57.219+11:00Comments on Extra Nos: Hmmm, yawn, whateverLPChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11352627830833515548noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15967712.post-66399390829161328142007-08-12T08:44:00.000+10:002007-08-12T08:44:00.000+10:00JK,The point we are making is that the atheist par...JK,<BR/><BR/>The point we are making is that the atheist parrots Kant but he does not go all the way with Kant and thus makes himself rediculous . Kant says that morality pre-supposes God; if you are going to have a sense of justice, you need an ultimate and perfect judge and that is God.<BR/><BR/>What Kant argued was that-- if there are no positivist evidence for God, there is moral evidence based on our moral senibilities.<BR/><BR/>Try using Kant on atheists that believe in morality, they are acting passe'.LPChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11352627830833515548noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15967712.post-49318844122366669802007-08-12T06:22:00.000+10:002007-08-12T06:22:00.000+10:00Kant was wrong about there being no evidence for G...Kant was wrong about there being no evidence for God's existence. The fact that some find that evidence unconvincing owes to their own sinfulness. Without the blinders of sin and Satan, they would be convincing.<BR/><BR/>All we can do is pray and let God work.<BR/><BR/>Kant based much of his work on the efforts of David Hume. Hume was skeptical about everything. He even doubted the reliability of science.<BR/><BR/>The debates are necessary. Christ's Cross is the point, but that can hardly be understood without His person.<BR/><BR/>I'll re-read Kant. His book is setting on my shelf.J. K. Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02329537522697826005noreply@blogger.com